State of Art Secure SDLC
Building a State-of-the-Art Secure SDLC: A Practical Guide
Introduction
Implementing a Secure Software Development Life Cycle (Secure SDLC), often referred to as DevSecOps, is notoriously challenging. However, with a well-structured approach, it is not only achievable but can also become a seamless part of your engineering workflow. At AquilaX, we leverage deep experience in Application Security, complemented by our purpose-built technology, to outline a comprehensive, automated, and scalable Secure SDLC environment that can empower organizations to release secure software with confidence.
This guide provides a technical, actionable roadmap for implementing a state-of-the-art Secure SDLC. The focus is on automation, minimal friction for engineering teams, and integrating security tightly into the development process.
For ease of understanding, this document assumes the following technology stack:
Source Code Management: GitLab
CI/CD Runners: GitLab Runners
Integrated Development Environment: Visual Studio Code
Programming Language: Kotlin with Gradle
Containerization: Docker
Production Orchestration: Kubernetes
Default Branch:
mainbranch for production codeIssue Tracking: GitLab Issues for software changes and vulnerabilities
Application Context: Developing an E-Commerce platform
While the specifics are tailored to this stack, the principles and controls outlined here are universally applicable to other technologies.
Foundational Controls: Setting the Stage for Security
Before introducing security-specific measures, certain foundational controls must be in place to enforce discipline and streamline workflows:
Protect the
mainBranch:Direct pushes to the
mainbranch must be prohibited.Code changes should only reach the
mainbranch via approved merge requests.
Enforce Repository Policies:
Every repository must include a
security-policy.ymlfile that clearly defines the assets, artifacts, and security boundaries for the application.
Merge Request Validation:
Require at least one approver for every merge request.
Enforce that the pipeline must pass (green) before a merge request can be approved.
Security Controls: Embedding Security Throughout the SDLC
1. Local Development: Pre-Commit Security Hooks
Objective: Prevent security flaws from entering the codebase early in the development cycle.
Tooling: Use pre-commit hooks to identify issues like hardcoded secrets, misconfigurations, and unsafe patterns before the code is staged.
Automation: Developers receive immediate feedback locally, reducing rework downstream.
2. Integrated Development Environment (IDE): Security Advisory
Objective: Shift security left by providing real-time insights in the IDE.
Capabilities:
Highlight security vulnerabilities inline within the code.
Support local builds that surface potential security findings
Enable developers to address issues during development, before committing the code.
3. Pre-Push Validation: GitLab Server Hooks
Objective: Prevent known issues (e.g., secrets or Personally Identifiable Information (PII)) from being pushed to the remote repository.
Implementation:
Apply server-side hooks to block pushes containing specific findings.
Focus solely on high-priority issues to minimize latency during the push process.
4. Branch-Level Security Scanning
Objective: Automate comprehensive security testing for all feature branches.
Pipeline: Trigger the following security scans for every push to any branch:
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Secret detection
Container image scanning
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) security checks
Malware scanning
License checks
API Static Scanning
Compliance checks
AI Generated Scanning
Integration: Results are sent to the AquilaX portal for centralized tracking.
5. Findings Management
Objective: Maintain visibility and traceability of all identified findings.
Details:
Every finding (e.g., security warning, potential vulnerability) is linked to the corresponding Git commit.
Findings are triaged centrally before being promoted to "vulnerability" status.
6. Pipeline Gatekeeping
Objective: Block insecure code from progressing in the pipeline.
Criteria for Pipeline Success:
No new, unaddressed findings of critical or high severity.
Manual acceptance from the author for exceptions.
7. Merge Request Approval
Objective: Ensure peer validation of all changes.
Process:
Authors can raise a merge request only after passing the pipeline.
A different engineer must approve the merge request to enforce separation of duties.
8. Vulnerability Transition
Objective: Escalate unresolved findings into actionable vulnerabilities post-merge.
Rules:
Once merged, any new findings automatically transition into vulnerability status.
Authors are allowed to accept vulnerabilities only for Software Composition Analysis (SCA)-related issues (e.g., licenses, third-party dependencies, container scanning).
Please consult the Runtime security for DAST implmentation
Scaling Secure SDLC in Large Organizations
Implementing these controls can be complex, especially in large organizations. Based on our experience, these are some key enablers for success:
Automation: Ensure all security checks integrate seamlessly into the CI/CD pipeline with minimal manual intervention.
Prioritization: Focus on high-impact controls first (e.g., pre-commit hooks, protected branches, pipeline gates) and expand gradually.
Skill Development: Invest in training to upskill engineers on secure coding practices and tool usage.
Centralized Management: Use a centralized portal (e.g., AquilaX) to manage findings, vulnerabilities, and compliance reporting.
Feedback Loops: Continuously refine policies and thresholds based on developer feedback and real-world findings.
By adopting these principles and controls, organizations can create a Secure SDLC framework that is robust, scalable, and developer-friendly, ensuring secure software delivery without sacrificing agility.
Last updated
