AquilaX Docs
Service StatusFeature RequestLogin
  • Documentation
  • Products and Services
    • Demo
      • Security Engineer - Assistant
      • Security Engineer - Chat
      • Scan code Snippet
    • Products
    • Services
      • Vulnerability Triaging
      • AppSec Training
      • DevSecOps Consultation
      • Deployment Options
      • Security Consultation
      • Integrations
    • Company Principles
      • Engineering Principles
      • AI Principles
      • AquilaX Mission
    • Proof of Value (PoV)
    • SLO/SLA/SLI
    • Security Scanners
    • Supported Languages
    • What is AquilaX
    • Success Cases
      • RemoteEngine
    • AquilaX License Model
  • User Manual
    • Access Tokens
    • Scanners
      • Secret Scanning
      • PII Scanner
      • SAST
      • SCA
      • Container Scanning
      • IaC Scanning
      • API Security
      • Malware Scanning
      • AI Generated Code
      • License Scanning
    • DevTools
      • AquilaX CLI
      • CI/CD
        • GitHub Integration
        • GitLab Integration
      • Vulnerability Tickets
        • GitHub Issues
        • GitLab Issues
        • JIRA Tickets
      • IDE
        • VS Code
    • Frameworks
    • Roles
    • Security Policy
    • Comparison
      • ArmorCode vs AquilaX
      • Black Duck vs AquilaX
      • AquilaX vs other Vendors
    • Press and Logo
    • Install AquilaX
    • Public Scan
    • Scanning Setup Guide
    • AI Chat Prompts
  • API Docs
  • Tech Articles
    • Proprietary AI Models
    • AquilaX Securitron
    • Securitron AI Service
    • Secure SDLC (DevSecOps)
    • Bending the technology
    • SecuriTron In Action
    • Future
      • The Future of Code Review
      • Building Superhumans
    • Blog
      • Breaking the Code: AquilaX
      • Rethinking Authentication in 2024
      • Software Supply Chain Security
      • OneFirewall - Network Security
      • The Art of Doing Source Code Review
      • Our Cloud Infrastracture
    • AppSec
      • 10 ‘must’ controls
      • OWASP Top 10
      • MITRE ATT&CK Framework
      • SQL Injection
      • DevSecOps
      • Insider Threats in Application Security
      • Secure API Development
      • RBAC in Applications
      • Security in CI/CD Pipelines
      • Audits in DevSecOps
      • Security Policies
      • S SDLC
      • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
      • API Gateway Security
      • RESTful APIs
      • Microservices
      • Secure API Development
      • API Security Best Practices
    • AI
      • AI part of AppSec
      • NL-JSON Model
      • Findings Review (AquilaX AI)
      • AI-Driven Vulnerability Triage
    • Tech Events
      • Web Summit 2024
    • ASPM
    • State of Art Secure SDLC
      • Validating Runtime Security
    • Announcements
      • 10 Billion
      • AquilaX Joins NVIDIA Inception
    • Webinars
      • Unlock the Future of Code Security with AI
  • AI Models
    • AI Scanner
    • Query
    • QnA
    • Security Assistant
    • Review
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. Tech Articles
  2. Blog

Rethinking Authentication in 2024

An AquilaX Opinion

PreviousBreaking the Code: AquilaXNextSoftware Supply Chain Security

Last updated 8 months ago

Was this helpful?

the authentication systems of modern applications play a pivotal role in safeguarding user data and ensuring secure access. Yet, it’s astonishing that in 2024, many websites, portals, and online services persist in implementing their own user authentication mechanisms, often reinventing the wheel instead of leveraging established solutions. While there are valid cases for bespoke authentication, such as government websites, the majority of platforms simply require basic user identification and authentication.

Before delving into the benefits of embracing modern authentication solutions, let’s outline the fundamental prerequisites that any engineering team should ensure for a robust authentication service:

1. Strong Passwords: Enforce stringent password policies to thwart brute force attacks and ensure password complexity.

2. Unique Username/Email: Prevent duplication and enhance security by mandating unique user identifiers.

3. Bot Prevention System: Implement measures to differentiate between human users and automated bots to mitigate fraudulent activities.

4. Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Augment security by requiring users to authenticate via a secondary method, typically a one-time code sent to their registered device.

5. User Enumeration Prevention: Conceal user existence to deter malicious actors from exploiting enumeration vulnerabilities.

6. Brute Force Attack Prevention: Implement mechanisms to detect and mitigate brute force attacks aimed at guessing user credentials.

7. Reverse Brute Force Attack Prevention: Protect against attacks where a single password is attempted across multiple accounts.

8. Password Recovery Service: Offer secure methods for users to regain access to their accounts in the event of password loss.

9. Email Validation: Verify the authenticity of user-provided email addresses to prevent misuse.

10. Password Reset Functionality: Enable users to reset forgotten passwords securely.

11. Geo Location for Authentication: Employ geo-location data to verify user identity based on their physical location.

12. Account Lock and Unlock: Implement mechanisms to temporarily lock user accounts after multiple failed login attempts, with provisions for unlocking.

13. Periodical Source Code Review: Regularly audit the authentication system's source code to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

14. Penetration Testing and Security Assessments: Conduct thorough penetration tests and security assessments to identify and rectify any vulnerabilities proactively.

While these measures form the foundation of a secure authentication system, the question arises: should engineering resources be expended on reinventing authentication mechanisms, or should the focus be on core functionalities?

This approach not only simplifies the development process but also enhances security by leveraging the expertise and resources of established authentication providers. Additionally, it fosters interoperability and user convenience, as users can access multiple services with a single set of credentials.

While this discussion primarily focuses on authentication, the principles extend to authorization and trust chain for third-party providers. Embracing modern authentication solutions such as OpenID Connect fosters a more secure, interoperable, and user-friendly digital ecosystem.

In conclusion, in the age of heightened cybersecurity concerns, it’s imperative for engineering teams to prioritize secure authentication without diverting resources from core functionalities. By embracing modern authentication solutions and leveraging established providers, organizations can enhance security, streamline development, and deliver a seamless user experience. Let’s make secure authentication the norm in modern application development.

The answer is clear: leveraging established authentication providers allows engineering teams to concentrate on developing the unique features that set their platform apart. At , we advocate for this approach, entrusting authentication to industry-leading services such as Google, Facebook, GitHub, or LinkedIn. By leveraging these platforms for user authentication, we not only streamline the development process but also inherit robust security measures implemented by these providers.

AquilaX
14 Controls for User Authentication