AquilaX vs other Vendors
AquilaX vs Traditional Security Vendors: The Future of DevSecOps

AquilaX vs Other Security Vendors
AI-Powered Security
β Yes (Advanced AI for triaging)
β Limited or rule-based detection
False Positive Filtering
β AI-driven, near zero false positives
β High false positives requiring manual review
Scanning Speed
β Under 60 seconds per scan
β Slower, sometimes minutes to hours
Parallel Scanning
β 9+ Scanners running simultaneously
β Sequential scanning, increasing delays
Code Context Awareness
β Deep understanding with contextual AI
β Basic static rule checks
Multi-Layered Security
β Covers SAST, SCA, IaC, API, Malware, Secrets
β Often limited to SAST & SCA
Seamless CI/CD Integration
β Works with GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket
β οΈ Requires complex setup
Deployment Options
β SaaS, Single-Tenant, On-Prem
β οΈ Mostly SaaS, limited on-prem options
Cost Efficiency
β Fraction of an FTE
β Expensive per-seat pricing
Automated Remediation
β AI-suggested fixes with developer-friendly insights
β Manual fixes required
Transparency
β Open-source & proprietary scanner support
β Proprietary & closed-source only
π AquilaX AI: Faster, Smarter, and More Cost-Effective DevSecOps!
Last updated
Was this helpful?